“Insufficient supply capacity, deception of supply reliability data, and high transmission and distribution costs.†The “Regulatory Report on Power Supply in 2011†of the SERC refers directly to the chaos of the electricity market.
From April to June 2011, the SERC and the dispatched agencies selected 215 of the 2 951 power supply companies nationwide for random inspections. A total of 492 cases of various problems were discovered during the inspection, involving 186 power supply companies, which accounted for 86.51% of the total number of power supply enterprises under inspection.
Among them, there were 158 power supply companies under investigation by the State Grid, 338 cases were found, accounting for 68.70% of the total number of problems, 137 power supply companies were involved, accounting for 73.66% of the power supply companies with problems, and 37 power supply companies subject to inspections by the South China Power Grid. 73 For example, it accounted for 14.84% of the total number of problems, involving 31 power companies, accounting for 16.67% of power supply companies with problems.
Since its establishment in 2002, the SERC has organized six power inspections. The problems in the power supply field still focus on power supply capabilities, power supply quality, power supply services, power supply market behavior, and power supply costs. The regulatory report was released a few days ago.
In this inspection, the SERC found 6 million yuan in violation of the national electricity price policy and the charging policy, and 258.29 million yuan in illegal power supply costs. For problem companies, the SERC requires that the rectification be completed by the end of October 2011.
At present, the domestic power supply sector is monopolized by the State Grid and China Southern Power Grid. The main local power supply companies are only Inner Mongolia Electric Power, Shaanxi Local Electric Power, Guangxi Water Conservancy and Electric Power, Sichuan Hydropower Investment Management Company, and Shanxi International Power.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission local government officials said: "Because of the existence of monopoly, there are many problems in the power supply field, such as inadequate services and unreasonable cost accounting. In addition, there are many power supply companies in the country, and power supervision cannot cover all power supply companies. Weakness causes recurring problems."
Poor quality of power supply capacity Poor investment in distribution network, irrational planning, and obstructed construction are the primary problems in the power supply field.
The Electricity Regulatory Commission reported that 25 power supply companies, such as Fujian Xiapu County Power Supply Company, Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company, Hainan Baisha Power Supply Bureau, and Qionghai Power Supply Bureau, have insufficient power supply capacity, and some of the substations are single-supply lines and single transformers. There is a greater risk of blackouts.
Some provinces and cities in Henan Province did not consider power infrastructure construction, land approval, or land acquisition. The substations were not put into operation and the power supply capacity could not meet the needs of urban development.
Second, the issue of power quality is still prominent. The spot inspection of the Electricity Regulatory Commission found that some power supply companies have experienced phenomena such as errors in power supply reliability and voltage qualification rates, misidentification of operating events, and missed recordings in the reliability management of power supply, and some have even resorted to falsification.
There are 54 home appliance companies such as Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company and Gansu Baiyin Power Supply Company under the State Grid, 8 power supply companies such as Guizhou Guiyang Power Supply Bureau under the China Southern Power Grid and Guangxi Dongxing Power Supply Company, and 10 local power supply companies such as the Inner Mongolia Xuejiawan Power Supply Bureau. This kind of problem.
In addition, due to the low degree of openness of the power supply market, there are power supply companies that take advantage of market dominance, set market barriers or service barriers, violate the principle of fair market competition, violate the relevant provisions of the State's power administrative license, and have not strictly implemented the national tariff policy and charging policies.
The China Electricity Regulatory Commission reported that 19 power supply companies and affiliates, such as the Fujian Putian Power Bureau and the Shaanxi Provincial Power Nanzheng County Power Supply Branch, still have mixed operations and improper trading practices.
Among them, Shaanxi Provincial Local Power Nanzheng County Power Supply Branch Company's 10kV high-voltage new user construction units accepted in 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 are all affiliated companies. All customer projects use power supply schemes instead of designs for direct construction. Give a budget.
In addition, 20 power supply companies such as Lanzhou Yuzhong County Rural Electric Power Bureau, Hunan Shaoyang Shaodong Electric Power Bureau, and Ordos Electric Power Bureau did not strictly verify the qualifications of power installation enterprises, and even some construction companies did not have relevant qualifications.
Transmission and Distribution Cost Accounting Confusion Transmission and distribution cost supervision is an important responsibility of the Electricity Regulatory Commission and is also the basis for the reform of the power system. In this inspection, the calculation of power supply costs was not standardized and there were many unreal cases. The SERC found a total of 2,582,900 yuan of illegal funds in the supply cost.
Mainly manifested in the fact that the inflated power supply costs are out of scope, some of the expenses are not in compliance with national regulations, and the engineering projects have not been carried forward to depreciate the depreciation expenses of fixed assets.
The China Electricity Regulatory Commission criticized the name, Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company, Guangdong Chaoan Power Supply Bureau and other 12 power supply companies had problems with out-of-scope expenses.
In addition, Beijing Changping Power Supply Company and Pinggu Power Supply Company were both criticized publicly for failing to accrue depreciation on time.
To sort out the transmission and distribution costs, this is a major task of the power system reform. Due to the lack of effective supervision, transmission and distribution costs are still controlled by power grid companies, and the amount continues to increase.
According to the statistics of the China Electricity Regulatory Commission, the total transmission and distribution costs of major grid companies in 2010 totaled 422.241 billion yuan, an increase of 20.92% over the same period of the previous year. Among them, depreciation, employee compensation and other expenses accounted for the largest proportion, accounting for 41.64%, 19.32% and 27.15%, respectively.
According to the "cost accounting method for transmission and distribution costs," "other expenses" refer to those that are not included in the materials, wages, welfare, depreciation, and repairs. However, in practice, it is difficult to clarify which are the transmission and distribution costs and what are the non-productive costs.
In the regulatory report, the SERC recommits to “promote the reform of transmission and distribution systems in power grid companies and implement independent financial accounting for internal transmission and distribution business. Intensify the reform of transmission and distribution prices, sort out the transmission and distribution costs, and establish scientific and rational inputs. Distribution price mechanism."
From April to June 2011, the SERC and the dispatched agencies selected 215 of the 2 951 power supply companies nationwide for random inspections. A total of 492 cases of various problems were discovered during the inspection, involving 186 power supply companies, which accounted for 86.51% of the total number of power supply enterprises under inspection.
Among them, there were 158 power supply companies under investigation by the State Grid, 338 cases were found, accounting for 68.70% of the total number of problems, 137 power supply companies were involved, accounting for 73.66% of the power supply companies with problems, and 37 power supply companies subject to inspections by the South China Power Grid. 73 For example, it accounted for 14.84% of the total number of problems, involving 31 power companies, accounting for 16.67% of power supply companies with problems.
Since its establishment in 2002, the SERC has organized six power inspections. The problems in the power supply field still focus on power supply capabilities, power supply quality, power supply services, power supply market behavior, and power supply costs. The regulatory report was released a few days ago.
In this inspection, the SERC found 6 million yuan in violation of the national electricity price policy and the charging policy, and 258.29 million yuan in illegal power supply costs. For problem companies, the SERC requires that the rectification be completed by the end of October 2011.
At present, the domestic power supply sector is monopolized by the State Grid and China Southern Power Grid. The main local power supply companies are only Inner Mongolia Electric Power, Shaanxi Local Electric Power, Guangxi Water Conservancy and Electric Power, Sichuan Hydropower Investment Management Company, and Shanxi International Power.
State Electricity Regulatory Commission local government officials said: "Because of the existence of monopoly, there are many problems in the power supply field, such as inadequate services and unreasonable cost accounting. In addition, there are many power supply companies in the country, and power supervision cannot cover all power supply companies. Weakness causes recurring problems."
Poor quality of power supply capacity Poor investment in distribution network, irrational planning, and obstructed construction are the primary problems in the power supply field.
The Electricity Regulatory Commission reported that 25 power supply companies, such as Fujian Xiapu County Power Supply Company, Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company, Hainan Baisha Power Supply Bureau, and Qionghai Power Supply Bureau, have insufficient power supply capacity, and some of the substations are single-supply lines and single transformers. There is a greater risk of blackouts.
Some provinces and cities in Henan Province did not consider power infrastructure construction, land approval, or land acquisition. The substations were not put into operation and the power supply capacity could not meet the needs of urban development.
Second, the issue of power quality is still prominent. The spot inspection of the Electricity Regulatory Commission found that some power supply companies have experienced phenomena such as errors in power supply reliability and voltage qualification rates, misidentification of operating events, and missed recordings in the reliability management of power supply, and some have even resorted to falsification.
There are 54 home appliance companies such as Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company and Gansu Baiyin Power Supply Company under the State Grid, 8 power supply companies such as Guizhou Guiyang Power Supply Bureau under the China Southern Power Grid and Guangxi Dongxing Power Supply Company, and 10 local power supply companies such as the Inner Mongolia Xuejiawan Power Supply Bureau. This kind of problem.
In addition, due to the low degree of openness of the power supply market, there are power supply companies that take advantage of market dominance, set market barriers or service barriers, violate the principle of fair market competition, violate the relevant provisions of the State's power administrative license, and have not strictly implemented the national tariff policy and charging policies.
The China Electricity Regulatory Commission reported that 19 power supply companies and affiliates, such as the Fujian Putian Power Bureau and the Shaanxi Provincial Power Nanzheng County Power Supply Branch, still have mixed operations and improper trading practices.
Among them, Shaanxi Provincial Local Power Nanzheng County Power Supply Branch Company's 10kV high-voltage new user construction units accepted in 2010 and the first quarter of 2011 are all affiliated companies. All customer projects use power supply schemes instead of designs for direct construction. Give a budget.
In addition, 20 power supply companies such as Lanzhou Yuzhong County Rural Electric Power Bureau, Hunan Shaoyang Shaodong Electric Power Bureau, and Ordos Electric Power Bureau did not strictly verify the qualifications of power installation enterprises, and even some construction companies did not have relevant qualifications.
Transmission and Distribution Cost Accounting Confusion Transmission and distribution cost supervision is an important responsibility of the Electricity Regulatory Commission and is also the basis for the reform of the power system. In this inspection, the calculation of power supply costs was not standardized and there were many unreal cases. The SERC found a total of 2,582,900 yuan of illegal funds in the supply cost.
Mainly manifested in the fact that the inflated power supply costs are out of scope, some of the expenses are not in compliance with national regulations, and the engineering projects have not been carried forward to depreciate the depreciation expenses of fixed assets.
The China Electricity Regulatory Commission criticized the name, Jilin Songyuan Power Supply Company, Guangdong Chaoan Power Supply Bureau and other 12 power supply companies had problems with out-of-scope expenses.
In addition, Beijing Changping Power Supply Company and Pinggu Power Supply Company were both criticized publicly for failing to accrue depreciation on time.
To sort out the transmission and distribution costs, this is a major task of the power system reform. Due to the lack of effective supervision, transmission and distribution costs are still controlled by power grid companies, and the amount continues to increase.
According to the statistics of the China Electricity Regulatory Commission, the total transmission and distribution costs of major grid companies in 2010 totaled 422.241 billion yuan, an increase of 20.92% over the same period of the previous year. Among them, depreciation, employee compensation and other expenses accounted for the largest proportion, accounting for 41.64%, 19.32% and 27.15%, respectively.
According to the "cost accounting method for transmission and distribution costs," "other expenses" refer to those that are not included in the materials, wages, welfare, depreciation, and repairs. However, in practice, it is difficult to clarify which are the transmission and distribution costs and what are the non-productive costs.
In the regulatory report, the SERC recommits to “promote the reform of transmission and distribution systems in power grid companies and implement independent financial accounting for internal transmission and distribution business. Intensify the reform of transmission and distribution prices, sort out the transmission and distribution costs, and establish scientific and rational inputs. Distribution price mechanism."
AlNiCo Magnets,Strong Magnets ,Powerful Magnets ,Industrial Magnets
Electromagnetic Equipment Co., Ltd. , http://www.nbmagnetools.com