Is it not practical for smart homes to fail in foreign countries?

OFweek Smart Home Network News Gartner, a world-renowned research and research company, launched an online survey in the second half of 2016 and surveyed nearly 10,000 consumers in Europe, America and Australia. It is mainly to investigate the real evaluation of the smart home products, application scenarios and smart electrical appliances by nearly 10,000 respondents, and to give a score of 0-100. As a result, surprisingly, consumers in developed countries have purchased less than half of smart home products. It seems that smart home products are not a cause for fire, and money accounts for only a small percentage of factors. And they bought the most affordable home surveillance cameras just right, but even so, the proportion is only 31%, while other large smart home equipment market is even more dismal. Consumers say they are more willing to buy non-intelligent home appliances. More than half of the respondents said that they are actually more willing to manually adjust the air conditioning and lighting fixtures, rather than through the mobile phone network to achieve the effect of automation, because they feel that some smart products do not save them much time or make them happy. Xiaobian example: Take smart curtains, do you say it's really smart? In fact, for the consumers, they are not too lazy to pull down the curtains. Therefore, it cannot solve the need of consumers to save time. Secondly, the function of intelligent curtains is still simply to stay on the shading, and there is no other high-intelligence function. I think many consumers think that an electric track is really a Necessary things. What about sweeping robots? This is relatively a solution to the consumer's need, many consumers are too lazy to move back after work, but the health environment does not work, this is a matter of physical and mental health, so sweeping robots are just needed, still smart. Although the price is high, people who are a little bit of money are willing to try. Followed by a smart camera, this is just a consumer demand, many consumers with strong sense of security will buy, and some pets will raise children will buy, after all, the price is not expensive, features are also changing, such as can be rotated, can be New features such as remote viewing, automatic alarms, and motion detection are constantly on the market, so it's no surprise that consumers are willing to buy. Written at the end: Obviously, when consumers use smart products, money is an important factor, but it is sometimes more important than money. We can draw a conclusion from the above research results. Consumers care more about smart home than money. Whether it can save them time, bring safety or happiness. Obviously, for the three smart homes exemplified by Xiao Bian, the curtains are not quite suitable, and the camera and sweeping robot are more in line. As for why the camera is better than sweeping robots, it may be the reason for the cheap price.

Posted on